Rehmani, M. Reisslein, Cognitive radio for smart grids: Survey of architectures, spectrum sensing mechanisms, and networking protocols. Vijay, E. Bdira, M. Ibnkahla, Cognition in wireless sensor networks: A perspective. Sun, A. Nallanathan, C. Wang, Y. Chen, Wideband spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks: a survey. IEEE Wirel. Ma, Y. Gao, Y. Liang, S. Cui, Reliable and efficient sub-nyquist wideband spectrum sensing in cooperative cognitive radio networks.
IEEE J. Areas Commun. Bogale, L. Vandendorpe, L. Le, Wide-band sensing and optimization for cognitive radio networks with noise variance uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Axell, G. Leus, E. Larsson, H. Poor, Spectrum sensing for cognitive radio : State-of-the-art and recent advances.
Signal Proc. Font-Segura, G. Vazquez, J. Riba, Nonuniform sampling walls in wideband signal detection. Signal Process. Gao, Z. Li, P.
Qi, H. Li, A robust cooperative spectrum sensing method in cognitive radio networks. Guimaraes, G. Aquino, Resource-efficient fusion over fading and non-fading reporting channels for cooperative spectrum sensing. Vien, B. Stewart, H. Tianfield, H. Nguyen, Efficient cooperative spectrum sensing for three-hop cognitive wireless relay networks. IET Commun. Urkowitz, Energy detection of unknown deterministic signals. Sharma, S.
Chatzinotas, B. Ottersten, Eigenvalue-based sensing and snr estimation for cognitive radio in presence of noise correlation. Lin, R. Qiu, Z. Hu, S. Hou, J. Browning, M. Wicks, Generalized fmd detection for spectrum sensing under low signal-to-noise ratio. Wang, N. Rahnavard, in Information Sciences and Systems.
Google Scholar. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Tao, P. Patcharamaneepakorn, Exact distributions of finite random matrices and their applications to spectrum sensing. Denkovski, V. Atanasovski, L. Gavrilovska, Hos based goodness-of-fit testing signal detection. Shen, H. Wang, W. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Blind spectrum sensing for cognitive radio channels with noise uncertainty.
Patel, Y. Trivedi, Goodness-of-fit-based non-parametric spectrum sensing under middleton noise for cognitive radio.
Rugini, P. Banelli, G. Leus, Small sample size performance of the energy detector. Shafer, A mathematical theory of evidence Princeton University Press, Wang, S. Feng, Q. Wu, X. Zheng, Y. Xu, G. Ding, A robust cooperative spectrum sensing scheme based on Dempster-Shafer theory and trustworthiness degree calculation in cognitive radio networks.
Xing, W. Wang, Z. Wang, K. Weighted cooperative spectrum sensing based on d-s evidence theory and double-threshold detection IEEEChengdu, , pp.
Nguyen-Thanh, I. Koo, Evidence-theory-based cooperative spectrum sensing with efficient quantization method in cognitive radio. Han, Q.
Chen, J. Wang, in Vehicular Technology Conference. An enhanced d-s theory cooperative spectrum sensing algorithm against ssdf attack IEEEYokohama, , pp. Men, P. Charge, S. Chen, A. Whitbrook, U. Aickelin, C. Roadknight, Data classification using the dempster-shafer method.
Pillement, Cooperative spectrum sensing with small sample size in cognitive wireless sensor networks. Liu, M. Jia, Z. Na, W. Lu, F. Li, Multi-modal cooperative spectrum sensing based on dempster-shafer fusion in 5g-based cognitive radio. IEEE Access. Arshad, K.
Moessner, Robust spectrum sensing based on statistical tests. Mokole, T. Catherine, E. Merran, H. Nicholas, P. So, selecting a signal analyzer with the lowest system noise floor is critical for wideband vector analysis. Figure 2 is a simplified block diagram of a vector signal analyzer.
Each of these components has its constraints and use cases. The input mixer-level setting is a trade-off between distortion performance and noise sensitivity. You can achieve a better SNR with a higher input mixer level or better distortion performance with a lower input mixer level. The best mixer-level setting depends on the measurement hardware, characteristics of the input signal, and specification test requirements. You can also apply an external low-noise amplifier LNA at the front end, with or without the internal preamplifier, to optimize the input level of the mixer.
The two-stage gain delivers greater flexibility to balance noise and distortion for optimizing the best low-input-level measurement performance. Figures 4 and 5 show demodulation analysis of a 5G NR signal with a low input level at about dBm. Figure 4 is the result of turning LNA off and Figure 5 is on.
At the same time, the input signal to the digitizer must be high enough without overloading the digitizer. This balance requires a combination of RF attenuator, preamplifier, and IF gain value based on the measured signal peak level. Keysight X-series signal analyzers let you press a single key to optimize these hardware settings, improving SNR and avoiding digitizer overload.
The optimization processing requires measuring the signal peak level and setting up the analyzer. However, the measured period may not represent the complete power characteristics of the input signal. A user can manually tweak the settings, such as IF gain and RF attenuators, to achieve the best measurement results.
Support maximum analysis bandwidth with a wide IF output option and an external digitizer. Get up to 4 GHz of RF bandwidth with dual-channel bonding. Modular form factor. Andrew Herrera A narrowband signal will fade uniformly, so adding more frequencies will not benefit the signal. Wideband channels, on the other hand, are called selective fading or frequency selective fading channels because different parts of the signal will be affected by the different frequencies.
Narrowband interferers may suffer loss due to selective fading and thus will have a lower probability of affecting another system. In wide channel bandwidth, the probability of interference from other transmitters increases linearly with bandwidth, but these signals are subject to frequency selective fading, although the fading parameters are likely to be different.
As a result, typically lower transmit signal power is needed in case of a narrowband channel. In wideband signals, the paths add algebraically, and the received paths are isolated by the correlation properties of the signal. So, typically higher transmit signal power is needed in wideband channels. Wideband is a low-power technology with the ability to penetrate walls and other physical interferences to radio signals. Applications such as connected cars, IoT devices, 5G wireless communications, internet telephony, video conferencing require wideband channels.
In a nutshell, narrowband refers to radio communications that carry signals in a narrow band of frequencies. It refers to radio channels whose operational bandwidth does not exceed the coherence bandwidth of the channel. Narrowband systems require less operating power, which makes them ideal for shorter-range, fixed-location wireless applications.
Wideband, on the other hand, refers to radio channels whose operational bandwidth may significantly exceed the coherence bandwidth of the channel. One significant advantage of narrowband over wideband is the lower probability of overlap with an interfering signal whereas in wideband channels, the probability of interference increases linearly with bandwidth.
Difference Between Narrowband and Wideband. Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects. MLA 8 Khillar, Sagar. Name required. Email required. Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.
0コメント